NOTE
Within this transcript several legal terms are used. Following
is a definition of these terms so the information may be clear
to the reader. These terms are not interchangeable.
Privilege
A
privilege is permission - granted by a higher authority to carry
out an activity. When gaining a privilege, one must often give
up a natural right. Example According to the U.S. Constitution,
people have a right to travel public roads in their private vehicles.
However, when they enter into a contract with the state to receive
a drivers license, they exchange their constitutional right to
travel for a state-granted privilege to drive, and are thus subject
to the stipulations of the state (auto insurance, realm of integral
registration, etc.).
Rights
Rights
are natural states of being, whether recognized or unrecognized,
that all humans inherently possess. (For example, the right to
procreate or grow food is obvious, but not necessarily recognized
by documentation.) Some rights are recognized in the U.S. Constitution,
such as the right to travel. Rights are nullified when they are
exchanged for privileges, such as when one enters into a contract
with the state through a marriage or drivers license. When natural
rights are exchanged for privileges granted from an outside source,
one becomes a nonsovereign, or a subject of the authority who
has given the privilege.
Civil
Law
Civil
law is the structure that organizes, controls, punishes and rewards
individuals who have given up their rights in exchange for privileges.
Common
Law
Common
law, a law of sovereigns, is based on the idea of self-responsibility
and natural rights. It is recognized under the Constitution as
being the natural state of being. Only in the last century has
common law been methodically exchanged for civil law.
Sovereignty
Sovereignty
is the state of being achieved when one operates only under common
law, or has taken total self-responsibility for their lives.
Spiritual
and Emotional Sovereignty
All
right, greetings to you. First off we would like to say that
spiritual sovereignty is the result of emotional sovereignty.
In addressing the idea of emotional sovereignty we will indicate
how spiritual sovereignty can be attained.
Here
are some definitions of emotional sovereignty. First of all,
it means liberation, freedom. A state of emotional sovereignty
is obtained when a person recognizes, both intellectually and
emotionally, that he/she is the total creator of his/her reality
and has sole responsibility for him/herself. These concepts sound
like simplistic metaphysics, for many lecturers and channels
espouse them. However we are going to take you deeper into the
areas where you have not attained emotional sovereignty, areas
where there is a disguised play being acted on the stage, and
the playbill says one thing but the message the play carries
says another. We will point out contradictions in the philosophies
on your planet, in your own thinking, and in the systems that
you have set up. This is to show you that even though you claim
you want spiritual and emotional sovereignty, you are actually
perpetuating its opposite. There
are many points we will bring up that, taken separately, may
look as if they are not connected. However we're going to link
them to show you just how deep is your sense of non-sovereignty
and how ancient is this state.
Sovereignty
and the Constitution
Let
us first talk about things that are very close to you here on
the earth plane, most notably, issues of an educational, political
or religious nature. Many on your planet feel that these ideas
are some of the cornerstones of your existence. As an example,
many individuals speak very highly of the Constitution of the
United States and how it guarantees freedom for all people. Yet
some things have happened since 1776 that have gradually pulled
the wool over your eyes, shall we say, so that you are saying
one thing but acting out its opposite. Now, in no way are we
pointing a finger; in no way are we telling you you're bad or
wrong. All the systems set up on your world, dating back thousands
of years, were taught to you by your forefathers (to be more
specific, your extraterrestrial forefathers), who have been grappling
with these same issues themselves. They looked to your planet
as a place where perhaps these issues could be healed once and
for all. Thus there is in no way a judgment of you. Your mass
consciousness has reached out to us, to other levels of consciousness,
asking for assistance to move through this most difficult time.
This is a time when you can enslave yourselves more deeply or
where you can finally achieve your sovereignty. Within the next
50 years you will decide the direction you wish to go. We and
others have answered your call, and we give you our perspectives
on some of these things to assist you. Should you choose to use
these perspectives, that is up to you. We will, of course, call
on those present for assistance with some of the historical facts.
We are somewhat limited in the method of channeling that we use
with this vehicle to bring through specific historical information
that she herself does not possess. Thus if anything we say is
historically inaccurate, you may correct us, although historical
accuracy is actually irrelevant.
Ways
You Enslave Yourselves
We're
going to talk about how there are many things occurring within
your reality right now that keep you enslaved. We will use a
very simple analogy In your society you have set it up so that
marriage is a socially sanctioned institution, and in some instances
legally sanctioned as well. If you operate within the parameters
of marriage, you are led to believe that you have certain privileges.
Now, it is a fact not well known that when you enter into a contract
such as marriage, there are issues other than marriage. When
you sign anything that has to do with a state or a local government,
there are times when you actually relinquish certain rights.
When you sign a marriage contract, you give up your right to
educate your children the way you see fit, giving the state authority
to educate them. Thus you give up your right to educate your
own children (depending on the laws of each individual state).
These things are not clearly understood when one enters this
contract - but it's important to note that nobody is trying to "get" you.
Because of your own deep-seated emotional beliefs, you have created
covert ways to keep yourself stuck in these dysfunctional emotional
beliefs. What is covert is what you're doing to yourselves. Do
you follow so far?
Another
example, one written into your Constitution, is the right to
drive. When you apply for a drivers license, you give up your
right and are thereby granted a privilege. But because you exist
under the Constitution, you have a right to drive. I want to
clarify that it is basically a right to travel on the roads.
The Supreme Court has ruled that this includes one's personal
automobile. Because that is your right, you don't have to do
anything to exercise it other than to exist. However, when you
enter into a contract (a drivers license), you relinquish that
right and subject yourselves to laws that are made regarding
the privilege you are now given. As teenagers you are taught
that you take drivers education, apply for a license and then
you can legally drive. Of course, when you get your license you
are then subject to the laws about automobile insurance, vehicle
registration, the laws of the road, etc. Your traveling then
becomes a privilege instead of a natural right, correct? You're
not taught that you have a choice.
Another
example is common-law marriage, marriage in the eyes of God (never
mind the piece of paper) - retaining your rights to educate your
children. Or you can sign a contract and thus no longer educate
your own children. You and your spouse become legally bound to
each other and are given certain supposed privileges. You are
not told you have choice, it is taken for granted that you get
married and sign the papers. There is seldom conscious thought
about alternatives that may better serve your situation. When
you go for your first drivers license, you are not told you have
a choice under the Constitution, which your forefathers wrote
and which you all co-created. You are not told you have a choice
either to retain your natural rights as a citizen or to sign
away those rights in exchange for certain privileges and all
the laws those privileges are subject to. If you retain, for
instance, your common-law rights -your natural rights under the
Constitution - even if you are caught by a policeman for speeding
there may be a hassle but constitutionally you still have the
right to travel. You can be fined or punished only when you have
given away your rights in exchange for privileges; then you are
bound by the laws. Are we correct? Not having a drivers license,
according to the law, does not give you the right to violate
the safety laws. According to the Supreme Court you are still
subject to the speed laws and other rules of the road. The punishment
for not having a drivers license differs from state to state.
In Arizona, as you said, it is simply a fine. In other states
it can be jail. So there is a wide variety in the type of crime
as well as punishment. A misdemeanor in Arizona could be a felony
in another state.
Pleiadian
Philosophy - 100% Responsibility
The
point we wish to make is that when you give up your power to
another person or an institution to keep yourself in line, you
have given up your sovereignty. Let us give you an example using
the Pleiadian philosophy. Let's say that the Pleiadians want
to drive cars on your planet. Their philosophy is one of total
self - responsibility, meaning if they hit someone, they are
responsible. If they are hit by someone else, they are responsible
for that, too. If they are in some type of automobile dispute,
each person involved takes responsibility for his position. There
are never any victims. In that case what you call your civil
law is not applicable. Civil law (the way you set up your system
on your planet) ensures that someone is a victim, that someone
must be held responsible because no one is willing to take responsibility
for themselves. Your system reinforces the idea that someone
is at fault, and therefore there must be someone to punish you
- because you are unable or unwilling to take total responsibility
for your own reality. Thus victimhood is continually perpetuated.
How many times a day do you see an automobile insurance commercial
on television where the injured person says, "It wasn't my fault.
Don't I deserve something for my pain and suffering?" This is
the attitude, the dynamic, that is constantly being perpetuated.
We recognize that you may not want to change overnight - it may
be too much of a shock. However, right now the majority of people
are unaware that they are perpetuating the cycle of fear, non-responsibility,
blame and victimhood. Imagine what it would be like to drive
daily and 100% of the time know that you are creating your reality,
know that everything that happens to you is created by you for
a very specific reason. If you get into an automobile accident,
if you hit someone, you take responsibility for it. Even if you
are hit from behind, for instance, you recognize that it is within
your reality only because you have drawn it there. Imagine a
society that holds these beliefs. It would have no victimhood;
it would be a society totally willing to take responsibility
for everything that happens to it. You are working toward this,
but because you have not recognized the trap you have set up
for yourself, it is almost as if you are running on a treadmill
trying to get down the street. Once you recognize how deep is
the structure you've created, you will be able to start actively
changing it.
Anger
Is Not Taking Responsibility
Some
of you have already been doing this. However, some of the ways
you are trying to change it, to get out of the structure, are
really dragging you deeper into it. Let's say you have someone
who studies the Constitution and realizes that there is a contradiction
between what was set up and what is going on now. Let's say this
person has a lot of victimhood energy. They become angry about
the situation and because they are not willing to look at the
source of their anger - their own inner victimhood, their own
relinquishment of their sovereignty - they externalize the victimization
and see the system as the perpetrator. You then have someone
who is angry and decides they're going to buck the system. Let's
say they refuse to register their car, get automobile insurance
or a drivers license. In their anger, their intent is to make
a statement - to cause trouble. This creates resistance toward
the very structure they are struggling to pull away from. All
it does is balance the intensity of the structure. It will not
free them but keep them chained to it. The person never looks
at the real reason for the anger - the relinquishment of personal
sovereignty - but instead blames that loss on someone else. You
can never be sovereign if you blame anyone else for anything.
And whenever you do, the structure is kept in place. There are
many individuals on your planet who feel they are engaged in
good causes when they are acting in anger. But we tell you that
anger will never solve the structural challenges of your society.
It can never break the structure. The question is, what will
break the structure? First an intelligent understanding of the
structure itself, why it was created and how it is kept in place.
After that it will be necessary to process any anger, martyrdom
or victimhood that you feel, and be willing to act from your
own integrity - not from anger or an intent to make a statement,
but because it's the only thing you can do in your integrity.
There are people at present who are starting to hear the voice
of their conscience, who are processing their victimhood, who
are beginning to see the true nature of the structure and how
it was put there. And when they realize this in their own conscience,
they can no longer keep it intact. They must follow their own
integrity. In that choice to follow integrity - cleanly, clearly,
with no anger - the structure begins to change. The issue is
not the structure that is enslaving you, but the fact that you
have allowed it to enslave you. If you can begin to understand
why you've allowed this, why you've forgotten you put it here
to begin with, then true sovereignty is right around the corner.
Comments?
Process
Inner Reality, Then Change Outer Choice
(Audience
participant) The entire insurance system - not just automobile
insurance, but life insurance, health insurance, malpractice
insurance, the entire spectrum - seems to be an automatic relinquishment
of sovereignty.
Yes.
(Audience
participant) I would think that anyone daring to create their
own reality couldn't participate in the insurance scheme.
If
you 100% absolutely believe you create your reality and know
it, you cannot participate in the insurance idea.
(Audience
participant) I guess I'm bringing it up because it seems to
be one of the easiest first steps to take. If someone is ready
to regain their sovereignty, to take back their power, it would
seem to me that facing this insurance issue would be a good
place to start. You just stop paying your premiums.
We
understand what you are saying, except the person has to be very
clear within. We would never suggest that someone stop paying
their premiums, because if they still fear an accident, they
will draw the accident to their doorway. They will not go through
the process of healing by withdrawing the insurance. What we
mean is that you will not heal this issue by withdrawing your
insurance first and then processing. You will heal it by processing
it to the point of integrity which leads you to withdraw your
insurance. You follow?
(Audience
participant) I follow, but I don't know if I agree yet. Can
we talk about it some more? [My wife] has had several patients
who had to maintain irresponsibility because they have insurance
that would not pay if they were found responsible.
Exactly.
You are rewarded when you're not responsible.
(Audience
participant) You said if someone is afraid, they haven't fully
processed this thing about being responsible. If they maintain
their insurance, that automatically keeps them in the state
of irresponsibility. It seems to me you have got to take that
step first.
Recognize
that your reality is not changed by changing the external things
in order to get to the internal things. Your reality is changed
by changing the internal things, which then affects the external
things.
(Audience
participant) If someone maintains their insurance because they're
afraid they're going to get in an accident or be punished if
they're caught without it are you suggesting that they process
the fear of the accident or punishment before they stop paying
their premiums; that it will be much more effective if they
first process the reasons why they feel they need this protection?
Wouldn't it be easier to find those issues by taking the step
and saying, "The insurance isn't doing me any good. it is keeping
me from my sovereignty," and stopping the insurance, allowing
those issues to come up even more clearly?
Some
people may choose to do it that way. However, if you removed
the physical thing [the insurance], they will simply transfer
their inner feelings to something else. It won't solve or change
anything.
(Audience
participant) The distinction, then, is that if they're not
on the path, the insurance shouldn't be removed; if they get
on the path, then that's another matter. This brings up something
else, which is the locking of one's house and car. Obviously,
if we create our own reality, then we have to create being
robbed. It is amazing that someone could give their power to
one piece of metal on a door that when locked makes them feel
safe. What you're suggesting is that they should process the
fear of being robbed before they leave the door unlocked. Is
that correct?
Yes,
because if they process the fear first, one day there will be
a welling of emotion, a feeling, a shift. The realization will
come emotionally that they do not need to lock the doors anymore.
That will not come in the same way if the attempt is to change
the external before the internal.
(Audience
participant) It feels like I'm advocating taking a symbolic
action - doing something, leaving the door open - not to hasten
the process but to focus the process.
Some
people can work that way; the majority do not. Recognize that
the human being is very adept at transferring issues, meaning
that if they start leaving their doors open they're going to
manifest the fear of invasion in another area of their life.
It will always be there in various forms until they process the
internal dynamics. We're certainly not disagreeing with you or
with any decisions you have made in the past or the future. Obviously
they've worked for you. As a whole, our recommendation is to
deal with it internally before doing it in the external world.
Dealing
with Victimhood
Try
to take a day and notice every time you are not being totally
100% responsible for your reality. Try to notice whenever you
fear being a victim. If you are completely honest with yourself,
you're going to see it often that day. A lot of it is a quite
unconscious patterning that is in some ways dormant, meaning
that it doesn't affect you negatively. There are many individuals
who put a lot of energy into the idea of victimhood. Those individuals
might have a very difficult time with some of the concepts we
are talking about because it requires you to give up ever seeing
yourself as a victim. That means recognizing whenever you reward
yourself for pain, suffering, or anything that is not of service
to you in a positive, exciting way. Recognize what you are doing,
such as letting the insurance companies pay your medical bills
only because you were not to blame. You are rewarded by an outside
entity if you are not to blame - that concept is totally incompatible
with the ultimate concept of common law and of spiritual and
emotional sovereignty. The structures on your planet are in place
and you're struggling against them to change them, but you can't
see what you're struggling against. The challenge now is to begin,
in the darkness, to make out the shape that you have created
to enslave yourself. We cannot express to you how powerful the
changes will be on your planet when you begin relinquishing these
old structures. You will do this layer by layer. Sometimes you
may think you're at the end, but there will be another five layers
to go. It's a very deep process you've created to protect yourself,
believing that you yourselves need to be taken care of, protected,
told what to do.
Processing
with Comfort
(Audience
participant) There is an old saying that may have become a
premise in our lives "If you're not part of the solution, then
you're part of the problem." In other words, as long as someone
is contributing to that structure - a system opposed to our
sovereignty - they are part of the problem. It seems pretty
polarized.
Ultimately,
there are no problems; it's all growth/challenge. Everything
is actually neutral. That idea is too dualistic from our point
of view.
(Audience
participant) I'm involved in a quiet court case about my refusal
to get a privilege license from the government to run my business.
It doesn't feel like I'm doing it in anger, although four years
ago when I was challenging the drivers license issue there
was anger and conspiracy and all that this involved. This time
it's simply that I cannot agree to pay the government protection
money like the Mafia demands for not harassing you. Operating
a business is a right, not a privilege. Would you recommend
to someone who operates a business to renew their license,
or to process this first before they take that step?
Our
recommendation is to totally and absolutely feel comfortable
processing before any steps are taken, because if it is done
with uncertainty or fear, it will add to the strength of the
structure instead of helping to dissolve it. That is the way
we see it; we are certainly open for disagreement.
(Audience
participant) I think there has to be a certain amount of processing
that occurs anyway, because this structure has become so ingrained
that we have to face the fact that when someone is ready to
take back their personal power, to regain their sovereignty,
one of the possibilities is jail.
Yes.
Becoming
Sovereign Includes Integrity, Education and Discernment
(Audience
participant) I could serve time in jail on this business license
issue, because it is a "crime" I have committed. In some states,
the drivers license issue could lead to jail. There is also
jail for the insurance issue in some states. So people have
to get to the point where they recognize the consequences of
their actions on both sides - the consequences of having given
up their sovereignty and continuing and perpetrating this state
- and the consequences of taking their sovereignty back.
Yes.
There is a gray point between the black and the white where the
transformation will occur. The consequence for bowing down to
the system is that you keep the structure intact There are definitely
consequences for pursuing the sovereignty idea, because you may
be punished. However, what it comes down to is acting from your
integrity. In your own inner searchings, when you find what your
integrity is guiding you to do, your sovereignty lies in following
that. As you are soul-searching, one of the key ideas is educating
yourself on the Constitution and as much law as you can; educating
yourself beyond the textbooks that the structures provide for
you, because the textbooks are written within the structure.
You must educate yourself from the source. That is where one
of the big challenges lie, because many of you have not been
able to tell the difference between textbooks written by the
structures and "clean" information from the source that leads
you into sovereignty. It is a process of discernment.
Victimhood
In Daily Life
We
don't want to sound harsh, but your social brainwashing is phenomenal.
For instance, individuals who call themselves patriotic Americans
have certain beliefs "Patriotic Americans pay their taxes." However,
when you research it you will find that the taxation system as
it exists now is not only contrary to the Constitution but is
in some ways illegal. Are we correct?
(Audience
participant) You're absolutely correct. The tax system is not
even part of the Constitution. The States never ratified it.
Why
do you think your early Americans had the Tea Party? Because
of taxation without representation. If you do your research,
you will find that the taxation system as it is set up now is
illegal. You have said that the Sixteenth Amendment was not ratified.
(Audience
participant) The Sixteenth Amendment - income tax - was never
ratified.
So
the premise that patriotic Americans pay their taxes is a distortion
of the original intent of the Constitution. The
second premise is, "All good Americans go to war when they are
called." Think about this Can you ever be of service to yourself
or to your country if you are doing something that you believe
is wrong? Individuals who unquestioningly follow that premise
may be in direct opposition to what they feel. A corollary to
the second premise, "All good Americans go to war to fight the
enemy," declares that you can be a victim, that there is an enemy,
and that there is someone out there you must defeat. This idea
of good and bad, enemies and heroes, will not free you from the
structure. Instead it keeps you enslaved. Now, examine day-to-day
things. For instance, there are laws that make you wear a helmet
when driving a motorcycle - protecting you - because it is assumed
that you are not capable of protecting yourself, of being responsible
for yourself. So something is imposed upon you. There are hand-gun
laws - an attempt to control - because there is the belief in
perpetrators and victims. This belief is constantly fed. Keeping
drugs illegal is another false attempt to protect "innocent" people.
All of these systems you have set up prevent you from understanding
what sovereignty is. Sovereignty is taking total, 100% responsibility
for yourself as an individual, for your community and for your
planet as a whole.
The
Constitution Always Leads to Sovereignty
(Audience
participant) We've been talking about present-day issues. Will
you discuss some of the history of sovereignty? For instance,
the founders of this country - George Washington, Benjamin
Franklin, Thomas Jefferson - were all Masons.
That
has Sirian connections. The Sirians were the ones who originally
tried to liberate you.
(Audience
participant) A great distrust for Masons has grown among many
of the patriot movements around this country and among people
who claim to be seeking their own sovereignty. They take issue
with the Masons because of the latter's involvement with the
Trilateral Commission conspiracy and so forth. There is a dichotomy
that has developed. Do you have any comments about the intentions
of the Masons, of the Founding Fathers - anything pertinent
to the founding fathers' understanding of our sovereignty and
what they expected to accomplish with the Constitution?
We
have to bring your extraterrestrial forefathers into this because
there is a very direct parallel between your Founding Fathers,
Masonry and the Sirian group that attempted to liberate you.
When the Sirians attempted your liberation, they assumed that
you needed help. Right there is a sense of inequality. Yet some
of their methods were used by the Founding Fathers as well. Some
of the Sirians - the genetic engineers - put certain latent genetic
codes in you that will soon be activated. This to ensure that
you would eventually be triggered into certain types of understanding.
Your Founding Fathers did the same thing. They were very, very
clever. It's not visible to the eye, but the way the Constitution
is written, if it collapses in upon itself, if it is perverted
in any way, it will eventually turn around and work for your
sovereignty instead of against it. Do you follow?
(Audience
participant) Is this an example of what you mean? Recently
in Arizona the automobile insurance law was changed, and recent
statistics show that only 50% of the people have insurance.
To register your car now you must actually produce proof of
your policy rather than just state that you have it. If you
cancel it and are stopped by the police for any reason, they
are told to take your license plates. This will occur over
the next 12 months as people's registrations come up for renewal
of course, insurance rates in this state have skyrocketed.
The only response I can see to this whole process is that by
the end of this year there are going to be so many people ticked
off that they will demand their sovereignty. Thus the perversions
of this issue will result in an increase of sovereignty, not
a decrease. Is that what you're saying?
Exactly.
The more oppressive your structure becomes, the more individuals
are going to feel the pressure. The more they will be spurred
on to do their own research and the more they find out about
their rights and their "privileges", then the more they will
begin exercising their rights. It's not going to come by rejecting
privileges; it's going to come by exercising rights. You see
the difference?
(Audience
participant) Was the Founding Fathers' shrewdness totally conscious
on their part?
Let's
say they didn't understand it to the point where they could explain
it to you. It was a sensing - a knowingness and a guidance. They
believed very firmly in what they were doing. It's necessary
to understand that there is no bad guy in any of this. The Emancipation
Proclamation, the abolition of slavery, has caused some of the
shifting in a non-conscious way. You had a group of people who
once had special laws written for them, and when they had to
be integrated into society, the structure of the laws needed
to change. Often the laws were written as an adaptation to a
circumstance that had a lot of pressure around it. This adaptation
was never checked and balanced with the Constitution; it was
a pressured, in-the-moment expedient. Again, there's no bad guy
here. It's just layer upon layer upon layer of distractions that
have solidified the structure itself.
Extraterrestrial
Background
(Audience
participant) I would like to pursue the concept of sovereignty
among first- and second-class citizens. You mentioned slavery,
but I'm thinking of the white man coming into North America
and driving the "Indians" before him, viewing them as inferior
being would you trace that attitude to extraterrestrial roots,
back to the time when the original Lyrans left Lyra, came here
and then later went to the Pleiades? This
was when they found Earth and populated it. Then along came
this new group of Lyrans and the Sirians to make this their
showcase, their genetic experiment and so forth. Didn't the
Lyrans and Sirians recognize the "property rights" of the Pleiadians?
What was their attitude in terms of property rights, private
ownership? The closest analogy is that of the white man and
the Native Americans. What was the thinking at that time in
terms of sovereignty? Did the Lyrans and Sirians feel they
had the right to come in and take over?
Recognize
that your forefathers were struggling with some of the same issues
then that you are now, and they had not resolved the idea of
property rights. It was basically the same as it is now on your
world the strongest one, the one with the most toys, wins. In
that particular situation you're talking about, the Lyrans did
not drive the future Pleiadians away; the future Pleiadians chose
to leave. However, had the Lyrans continued their aggressive
interactions, they would have eventually driven out those Pleiadians
had the latter stayed. Ownership is based on what you can seize,
in terms of this galactic history. Recognize that when people
feel they have to take something from someone else, they must
in some way believe themselves to be lacking; they must in some
way be deficient in their sovereignty. When one is truly sovereign,
coexisting with other sovereigns, there are no property disputes,
there are no ownership problems. To describe this type of reality
is very difficult, because to some people it sounds like communism.
But that is not at all what we are speaking of.
Forefathers
Taught Victim/Aggressor Roles
Unfortunately
we cannot tell you that your forefathers had wonderful and wise
ways of dealing with these things, because they didn't. You learned
what you are experiencing now from them. You learned from them
that the strongest rule, that some are victims and others aggressors.
Even to this day, in the collective human soul there is the belief
that you don't own this planet. This belief is what has delayed
you for so long in taking a global stand environmentally and
socially. You still don't believe you own the planet or that
you exist and co-create with the planet on equal terms. You have
no concept of your own sovereignty. In an attempt to figure out
what sovereignty is, you take from others. (Audience participant)
It seems to me that our misperception of our own sovereignty
is exactly what the Lyrans wanted us to believe, especially in
light of the fact that it was the Sirians that had to come in
and free us. There seems to be an extraterrestrial assumption
that we are inferior, like the Caucasian assumption about Blacks.
Is there an extraterrestrial belief that we don't possess any
rights and that we exist as Homo Sapiens only as a privilege
granted by our creators (the ETs)? Has our entire pattern as
a species been that of existence by privilege and not by right?
Only extraterrestrials who are insecure with their own sovereignty
would believe that. However, your forefathers and the offspring
of your forefathers have evolved quite significantly since that
time.
Rights
and Privileges
We
would like to define the difference between rights and privileges.
These words are not being used interchangeably. Privilege is
something that is granted to you from another source. Right is
inherent by your existence, innately. For instance, you have
a right to celebrate God. But you're given the "privilege" of
worshipping God when you go to church and pay your dues.
(Audience
participant) We have talked a great deal about the nature of
the agreement between the Zetas and Homo Sapiens. If there
is an assumption that we exist as a privilege (whether it's
our belief or the ETs), this contract, whether it be a contract
between us as a species with the Zetas or individual agreements
with the Zetas, is similar to the drivers license issue. Is
it exercised from our side without conscious knowledge of the
consequences?
Absolutely.
You have used the term implied consent. Because you believe your
existence is a privilege, then your interactions with the Zetas
are subject to the laws of that privilege in the masses' belief
system, and some of those laws you may not even be aware of.
(Audience
participant) Then it is like my having a drivers license and
my belief that driving is a privilege granted by a higher authority.
This "higher" authority grants me the privilege of using the
roads, using an automobile, etc. By accepting that privilege,
I've implied my consent; therefore I must agree to have insurance,
registration and not let someone else use my car who does not
have those things. All of this happens because I have accepted
the privilege rather than exercised my right?
When
you already have the right to travel automatically.
(Audience
participant) And so the Zetas, of course, read our unconscious
minds and know that we think our existence is a privilege.
Therefore when we ask, "Why are you doing this?" they say, "We
have the right".
Yes,
because you have implied your consent by playing out the role
of a helpless species. That's one way of looking at it. If you
were sovereign, no one could have rights over you, but since
you're not active sovereigns, someone assumes rights over you.
There's always hierarchy in a nonsovereign atmosphere, but in
a sovereign atmosphere there is never a hierarchy. As a species,
you have the right to interact with your galactic neighborhood,
to know your heritage. You have a right to explore all levels
of consciousness and reality. You have set up privileges to protect
yourself from some of the scary things because you feel nonsovereign.
And as you build this elaborate structure (based on privileges
and not rights), you start distorting your own version of the
universe. Those rights that we just mentioned are always active,
but if you are not sovereign, you can't interface with them.
Therefore, you will act out your right to interact with other
species through the privilege structure you have set up, which
will be equal to your belief systems. To put this in another
way, you will always act out your right to travel, but because
you are not sovereign, you must act out that right according
to the structure of the privileges. Therefore, you act out your
right to travel through the privilege of your license, your insurance
and your registration. Do you follow? This is a very significant
point. With the Zetas, you will always act out your rights as
a species. Your rights will always be there, but you can't see
them. You can't know your rights unless you are sovereign. Therefore,
you must act according to the nonsovereign privileges, which
seem as if they are given to you by someone else. Therefore,
because you believe you are not sovereign and can be victimized,
you will act out your right to communicate with other species
through that belief system and the structure that allows you
to be victims. You are, in fact, always in touch with your rights.
You've cloaked them, you've twisted them, you've distorted them
into your privileges and have come to believe that privileges
are rights, when they are really two different things. In terms
of the Zetas, the only framework within which you could interact
with them has been one of inequality, hierarchy, manipulation,
control or fear because those are the very structures upon which
your society is built. Do you follow?
(Audience
participant) Obviously, one of the things that keeps us from
claiming our sovereignty is our religious structure. This concept
that God is sovereign and that we are his subjects agrees with
the early ET influence; this is what they wanted us to believe.
Can a true sovereign ever have subjects?
No.
Absolutely not. If the religious structure broke apart on your
planet, every other structure would collapse. No other structure
could support itself after that.
(Audience
participant) We have played that out in our society. We have
called people "subjects." We have called a baron or king a "sovereign," and
they have had subjects. However, to some degree you
are also interlinked.
In
only one sense are we saying this You could never truly be sovereign
unless everyone else in your reality bubble were also. That doesn't
mean everybody in your world, but everyone with whom you interact.
This is one way of looking at it. The sovereign king can never
truly be sovereign, in the sense that he can't be sovereign if
he's dealing with inequality.
(Audience
participant) I have something to clarify. Let's say I am truly
sovereign and my friend is not. What if I see him as a complete
sovereign, even though he is playing the role of a subject?
You
see him as a complete sovereign because it's all the sovereignty
you can allow yourself to see. Recognize that there's not a point
of 100% sovereignty, just like you can't limit yourself to the
amount of love you can feel today. There's no end to sovereignty.
So your ability to see sovereignty reflected in other people
is limited by how much you can see in yourself. It's ever-expanding.
Thus you may look at your friend and see a total sovereign. He
may not feel sovereign; you are simply mirror reflections for
each other. As the entire planet plays out the sovereignty issue,
you will help each other. You're all intricately intertwined,
though you would like to think you're not. You're not dependent
on the other person for your attainment of sovereignty, but at
the same time their reflection of sovereignty to you is crucial.
Obviously this transformation into fourth density is very much
a part of claiming your sovereignty.
Sovereignty
Techniques
(Audience
participant) This is such a widespread issue - through religion
and politics and economics and sex and relationships - is there
anything in particular that someone might do to start on this
road?
Each
person will be different, but you can start by identifying the
areas of your life in which you are blatantly nonsovereign. Look
at those. Understand why that is so. We'll give you some hints
First, look at your religious structure. Look at your political
structure, your economics and your education system. Then look
at your legal system. (Those suggestions are going to open a
can of worms.) Each person will go through the process of attaining
sovereignty in his/her own way. We would suggest that you obtain
any research material you can. There are schools that teach these
principles (and we're not referring to metaphysical schools;
we're referring to schools that teach common law). That's a start
for some people. There's no structure to follow on your planet
to become sovereign, because it's not anything you've ever experienced.
You are creating the structure as you go.
(Audience
participant) Can there ultimately be a structure?
In
a sense, there cannot be. Each has to do it in his own way.
(Audience
participant) I like the idea of becoming sovereign and I want
to begin taking steps. I found blocks to that in my Life that
have shown me I am not truly sovereign.
You
don't feel truly sovereign, you mean.
(Audience
participant) At various times I have found myself in a position
of borrowing money, or using certain rationales to renew my
drivers license. Sometimes it's very difficult to be sovereign
without your own piece of land.
Here
is a case where if you forced this on the physical level you
would not accomplish anything, because the internal ideas must
first be processed.
(Audience
participant) That was my frustration. I found myself wanting
to take too large a step, which may have been self-sabotage
on my part Does that make sense?
Yes,
because to some degree the self-sabotage would be the reinforcement
of your identity as a failure.
(Audience
participant) And as a "subject" using these terms.
Yes.
And if you are willing to take specific steps to achieve that,
you do what you can. You did some very valuable things internally.
(Audience
participant) Internally, but I am concerned about my external
reality, because ultimately to be sovereign you must take physical
action. I imagine a lot of people are in a situation similar
to mine.
You
are correct. But there is never a need to force it. Force implies
resistance; resistance is what makes force necessary. We would
always suggest that you do what you can. What you are attempting
to do on your planet with this sovereignty idea is to stop keeping
the dynamic of polarity in place. Therefore, when you go inside
to process and then take the steps from your realizations, you
are not using force. Force is not needed; thus there is no resistance.
It is much more thorough, much more transformational. Do what
you can. Keep processing. There are small steps being taken.
Recognize that the shift in your own belief system is extremely
powerful, not only for you but for mass consciousness in general.
Let's
give you an example. Let's say you went to war. Which has more
impact - 100,000 men burning their draft cards out of protest
or 100,000 men shifting their consciousness? It is tempting to
say that burning draft cards has more impact, but that is not
the case. Those people who burned their draft cards may be burning
them out of anger or fear, not necessarily out of a change in
consciousness.
(Audience
participant) If 100,000 men burn their draft cords and don't
go to war, are you saying it is not as effective as a change
in consciousness- even though 50, 000 of those men may actually
continue to participate in the war (if that's possible with
the change in consciousness)? I used to think that the physical
demonstration of burning the draft card, for example, was the
most important step that could be taken. But you are saying
that the change in consciousness of the draftees is much more
important than the physical action of burning the draft card.
Yes.
The change in consciousness is much more impacting than you can
possibly imagine. Let's say there are 100,000 people burning
those draft cards. Maybe some men are burning them because they
are mad at their fathers, consciously or subconsciously. They
don't care if they go to war; they're just mad at their fathers,
and this is a way to vent that anger. If they're doing it out
of anger they may have no idea why they are angry. If they delve
into it, that's when they start changing their consciousness.
Someone who gets a drivers license after being educated about
rights, privileges and sovereignty has taken an immense step
- because now he's not doing it out of denial or ignorance. Instead
he is doing it with a shift of consciousness, doing it consciously.
Let's say that 100,000 men burn their draft cards because of
a change in consciousness. But in this little story let's say
they were forced to go to war anyway. Having those 100,000 men
with that change of consciousness in the army will have a tremendous
impact on the mass consciousness of the army itself.
(Audience
participant) I think we saw that in the Iraqi conflict and
that may have manifested as very few deaths on one side. Even
though there were lots of Iraqi deaths, there could have been
ten times that number.
There
was most certainly a shift in consciousness in terms of the troops
that went to Iraq. Many went not because they believed in the
conflict, but because they felt in some way that their energy,
their consciousness, would be useful. Therefore, to judge a man
for going to war when you do not know his motivations actually
helps to maintain the structure of dysfunction rather than disintegrate
it.
(Audience
participant) If the consciousness shifts in these 100,000 men
before they go off to war, they're not going to burn their
draft cards out of anger. Instead they are going to realize
precisely what step binds them to the Military. It is not the
draft nor the induction, but the taking of the oath.
Which
they do voluntarily.
(Audience
participant) The insidious thing is that the government and
the Military do not point that out. They tell you that it's
the induction that turns a Civilian into a Military person.
You
are led to believe that, yes. We want to clarify what you said.
There may be some confusion, and this is a very important point.
You are led to believe, just like with the drivers and marriage
licenses, that when you get that draft card and you are inducted,
you must serve. However, you are never committed to serve until
you raise your hand and take the oath, and the taking of the
oath is voluntary.
(Audience
participant) Because being forced to take an oath is invalid.
And
so, as you said to the channel, there have been men who have
not taken the oath and thus were dismissed from the induction
and didn't have to serve.
(Audience
participant) Yes. It caused quite a commotion, but they were
ultimately dismissed.
The
oath that you take to get into the military is a voluntary oath,
and you have not known that. The marriage license is also a voluntary
procedure, as is the drivers license. Paying taxes is a voluntary
procedure. But you have led yourselves to believe they are not,
and that is what is insidious.
Let
us go back to the beginning of this session before we close.
Emotional sovereignty means understanding your reasons and motivations
and healing those denied parts of you, which will eventually
lead you to take 100% responsibility for your reality - and the
result of that is spiritual sovereignty. You are on the path.
You will create it. Have patience and trust yourselves.
Much,
much love, and goodnight.
Authors
Details: Lyssa Royal Germane Channeled
Lyssa Royal is an internationally known channel and author. Germane
considers himself to be a non physical group consciousness associated with the
Orion Light - a future integrated version of the galactic family of which we
on Earth are a part. He chose the name "Germane" because of it's english definition: "Coming
from the same source, or significantly relevant to." There is no connection to
St. Germain.
The Authors Web Site |
|
