|
Sasha:
All
right, this is Sasha. Greeting to all of you.
Greetings,
Sasha.
It's
a pleasure to be here with you and especially talking about one
of our favorite topics. We're going to lighten it a little bit
in the second half, and we're just going to throw out to you
that some of you have expressed some interest in the past about
knowing personally about some of my relationships. That information
is certainly available tonight if you would like to ask, just
as a model so that you can be presented with a different way
of having relationships. Our way is not any better or any worse
than yours. It's simply different; it's an expression of who
we are. Germane gave you quite a lot of information and this
information that he's given you are the tools you will now have
and carry into the future relationships that you have in this
life. It doesn't have to be through pain that these changes are
brought about; it really does not. Now, of course, if your belief
system says that you must grow with pain, then it's more than
likely you will manifest it, but you don't have to manifest pain.
And you will begin to see, as you apply some of the tools that
were given to you this evening, some of the understandings, you
will begin to see changes in yourself and in your relationships.
We cannot stress to you how much we mean what we said about that.
You will see changes if you start to recognize when you are operating
from third-density principles and attempting to bring them into
a fourth-density relationship. When you start recognizing that
and you start changing yourself, you are going to see tremendous,
powerful changes within your life. Do not be surprised, and those
changes will bring ecstasy and joy. They do not have to bring
pain. Now, we'd like to take this opportunity to just be available
to you for questions. So we're going to let you orchestrate this
part of the evening. What would you like to talk about? As you
look into our future on Earth, what probabilities do you see?
From the probability that we view, the way we see the changes
in relationships happening is that the next 20 years is the crucial
point. And within the next 20 years we perceive first more stress
in relationships that are fighting change, overall, not necessarily
in every single relationship. The actual overall societal change
of relationships may externally seem to be a change brought about
by necessity, necessity meaning single parents, perhaps with
the shortage of a certain sex in a certain age group. However,
what will bring about changes in your relationships will not
be these external things but will be the internal momentum of
your change of energy. The external things will just be symptoms
of the change. Do you follow? So the next 20 years are the most
crucial in our estimation. After that, you will begin adapting
with less resistance overall, but of course within the next 20
years there need to be pioneers and groundbreakers, and many
of you will choose to be such pioneers, and that is up to you
and your personal choices and your agreements. But you are going
to see changes in this lifetime, absolutely 100% guaranteed.
Now, we would like to talk about the idea that is threatening
to many of you, but as you know is a very solid foundation of
Pleiadian thought. And that idea is the ability to love more
than one person simultaneously. Third density is the density
of polarity; literally that means two ideas are present, like
two ping-pong paddles with a ball in between, back and forth,
back and forth, back and forth. That dynamic cannot be broken
in the density of separation and duality. As you move into fourth-density
type relationships, you're going to find that this rigidity is
not necessarily going to work for you. It can, but it might not
necessarily work for you. And so the introduction then of a third
or a fourth or a fifth person is going to change the dynamic
totally. And that is something that we would like to address,
because there are many fears in many of you about the idea of
loving more than one person simultaneously, and these fears are
based in third-density premises so they cannot be applicable
in a fourth-density reality. One of these premises is that if
your mate loves another person, it takes away the love they can
have for you. That is a third-density idea, because using the
paddle idea, you have a finite amount of energy that you're batting
back and forth with the ping-pong ball. You are batting this
ping-pong back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. There
is a finite amount of energy expended between these two because
there's no expansion. Now, if you in third-density, insert a
third variable, you are going to affect the energy between the
two paddles, most definitely. The dynamics will have to change.
In a fourth-density structure (which has been outlined by Germane),
the ideas of unconditional love and trust, living in the moment,
honesty, etc., are present. These 4D ideas do not support the
idea that a third, fourth, fifth or millionth person entering
your relationship can take away from the love that a mate can
feel toward you. It cannot happen. Absolutely cannot happen.
Period. Now, those of you who have spoken to us at length are
aware that presently I have a single mate. I was also in a mated
group, and in this mated group, the intensity of the love between
the individuals was as strong, as intense, as equal to the love
that is now felt between myself and my one mate. If another mate
comes into my relationship now with my mate, it will not be a
break in the flow of the energy. It will simply be an adding
of another facet through which the energy can travel. And that
is the difference between third- and fourth-density relationships
when you're talking about the ability to love more than one person.
The basic structure of third-density is set up to support the
idea of duality. The basic structure of fourth density is set
up to experience multiplicity. So therefore, the amount of love
is never less in a fourth-density relationship. Do you all follow?
Thoughts,comments
or ideas or questions on this?
In
third density it is so hard for me to see past the element
of time. When you're used to having a mate and therefore spending
a certain amount of time with that mate, and then you bring
in another mate, there's a certain amount of time spent with
her that in my mind I perceive isn't spent with me. I get caught
in the time factor.
Well,
if spending time with your mate is equal to the idea of you not
spending time with your mate, there will be no problem here.
There is an inherent inequality within the emotions that is saying, "This
is better than this, so if I don't have this, I am deprived." Do
you follow? Now, again, we're not saying, as Germane was not
saying, that you must at all cost heal this, you must just go
for it. Make your choices. As you start choosing how you want
to live, these things are going to begin coming up. But recognize
where the time element comes into it. It is not time. It is your
identification with something that is equal or unequal in your
reality. When you love yourself unconditionally, then the time
spent with your mate will be equal to the time spent alone.
So
when I spend time with my mate, I'm not alone. When I'm not
with my mate I'm alone, so because of the aloneness, I don't
feel the one is equal to the other.
Exactly.
And again in fourth density, as Germane was saying, the recognition
is there that you are the generator of your happiness. You are
it. And so when that recognition is there, that is when it is
equal to be with the mate or to be with yourself because you
love yourself as much as you love the mate. Both companies are
appreciated. Both are equal. And when you see your mate, it's
exciting in the moment; when your mate is not there, you are
excited in the moment with yourself.
Sasha,
when you lived with a group, did you all live in one dwelling?
I know now you two have separate dwellings.
We
did live in one dwelling that is very similar to the one I live
in now only on a larger scale. Did you want more on that?
Well,
no, I was just curious about that because. Did you each have
your own rooms in that dwelling?
Yes
So
that you could be by yourself as much as you could be with
someone else.
Yes.
There were basically three different phases of environments.
One were rooms of privacy, if you will, that only we entered.
Then there is a secondary room where you enter with a specific
group, invited guests you may call it. And then the third environment
is the entire community environment, which is open to all. Question.
Or comment.
We
have a lot of barriers in our society toward this information,
some of which are religion and societal conditioning. Can you
help us learn how to share this information with the public
and teach a new form of relationships?
Just
like you cannot be responsible for hurting another, you cannot
be responsible for enlightening another. Do what you can. But
don't start any more crusades! Each way is really different for
each civilization, because the way that you will heal this is
parallel to your identity as a species. So for instance, the
Pleiadian viewpoint on the relationship issue came about because
of our past and who we were in the past and through this evolution
we came to this point. The same thing with the Essassani, and
the same thing with the Orions. Now you on your planet, through
who you have been as a species, will develop your own personal
way to make this transformation. We do not perceive, at least
right now, that there is a method by which to communicate with
Earth humans that is any more thorough than what we have begun
doing with you. The shift is going to happen. It is going to
happen quicker as people consciously make choices to pursue these
things. It will take longer if they resist it, but the transformation
to fourth density is going to happen. The critical mass is going
to happen. It's just a question of when. And that is up to all
of you and whether you choose to take the bull by the horns or
whether you choose to run from the bull. Either way, it is still
going to happen.
Sasha,
one of the other trouble areas in relationships is that a lot
of third-density relationships have been based on really feeling
like you own or you possess the other person. I assume in fourth
density that is completely absent.
That
feeling of ownership or possession is the idea that Germane was
talking about, having to deal with the need to control. So it's
that issue. Just with a different twist, or not even that different.
Sasha,
you seem to be willing to talk about your own history tonight.
We
knew you would be the one to bring it up.
Of
course! Did you go right into this group from puberty?
Again,
the line of puberty is not as defined as it is in your culture.
After puberty I did a lot of studying and traveling and had relationships
that you might call "flings." But when I came back to my planet
and built a homebase there, that's when I was in the group.
So
you were with the group 10-12 years or so?
Equivalent,
yes, very rough, but it comprised the greater portion of my relationship
experience.
And
we've discussed before that there were seven members of this
group, one non-Pleiadian and six Pleiadians. Is there anything
further that would be helpful in terms of how and why you left
the group? I assume the group itself also disintegrated.
Yes,
it was simply a recognition that the excitement of the individuals
involved in the group had changed. Several of the individuals
wanted to go off the planet and explore, and some chose to go
into a more quiet time. So when the excitement to change the
relationship was recognized, there was no resistance, there was
no fighting, there were no tears or anger. It was a recognition
that the next step was to move in this direction. And because
we had not anchored the past or the future into this relationship,
it was a natural movement from one state to another.
One
last question along these lines. We know that the Orion relationships
are changing, that since the Dawn they will be reevaluating,
rethinking their entire concept of relationships not based
on conflict. We are going through relationship transformation.
I would assume synchronistically that your civilization would
also going through relationship transformation. If that's true,
what is the nature of that transformation that you're experiencing
as a culture?
We're
not so much experiencing a change in relationships as you are
in the same way. It's a little bit different. The change that
we are experiencing has more to do with our change in our relationship
with other species in that to some degree, not out of a sense
of prejudice, let us say, but we have often preferred relationships
with Pleiadian entities. We are opening up possibilities of relationships
with all different types of species, and therefore for instance,
to give you a very dramatic example, let's say there's a species
who is so nonhuman that the sexual expression becomes impossible.
We are learning the expression of that sexuality and that love
in other ways. You follow?
Yes,
and the time that you invited Bashar [an Essassani] and Harone
[a Zeta] to your dome...What happened?!
Harone
was baffled to say the least. You know those Zetas.
But
that's the kind of thing you're discussing. That was kind of
a landmark...
We
never said that inviting them to the dome was a sexual experience,
but that represents our reaching out to other species more than
we ever have. Now, regarding the group that I was involved in
for that amount of time¾we've said six Pleiadians and one non-Pleiadian,
the non-Pleiadian was Essassani. That was not so much of a challenge,
but he taught us a thing or two.
In
third density, we have a situation where when children have
been adopted out for example, it seems like it becomes very
important to many of them to find out who their genetic parents
are. A lot of this searching goes on. Maybe, in your situation
you have enough control over your sexual activity that you
know when you are being fertilized and when you aren't. But
in the transition that we're going through we have not developed
to the point where we're always aware of that. Does the child
always knows who their mother and father are? Does it become
important for the child to know?
No.
The idea of some individuals feeling the desire to know their
true parentage is a reflection of the society's or your mass
consciousness's need to gain your identity through your past.
And if you were to live in the moment, that becomes irrelevant,
because literally the past does not hold your answers; the present
holds your answers. So because the children in our society are
literally the children of all¾which is something we do share
with the Essassani, no child feels unwanted. No child feels the
need to find their identity through their past. They are very
secure in their identity in the present. Again, a different developmental
structure.
If
sexuality is allowed to have its natural place which is everywhere
in everything you do, it can't be used against you, can it?
Exactly.
Again, sexuality is not sex. We're not talking about the sex
act. We're talking about the natural flow of energy in creation
that is sexual/sensual in its nature. It is of a creative vibration.
Now, many people have made the comment that they feel the sensual
energy from the Pleiadian entities, and that is simply that we
allow that energy to flow; there is no sexuality/nonsexuality.
There is simply one expression, and if that is the case, sex
does not become a big deal. It cannot be used for control or
manipulation. What is interesting is that we have had encounters
with females in your society (through this channel) who have
found us threatening because of the sensual energy perhaps that
they are perceiving in us. We are therefore threatening to them
because perhaps we may gain more attention in a direction they
don't want to look at within themselves.
Not
only that, but I haven't met a man who hasn't sat here and
said, "Hmm, going to bed with Sasha..." I mean, any man that
I've been around, that I've ever spoken to about being around
your energy, all of a sudden this is the ideal sensual package
that they all think they've been searching for.
And
we tone it down quite a bit!! [Laughter] Generally, if people
judge their own or others' sexuality, they may be very threatened
by our type of energy.
On
our planet and in third density, there is so much emphasis
on body types. I will be attracted to a certain body type;
someone else will be attracted to this body type. Right now,
we are all supposed to be skinny body types and physically
in shape, and we're not supposed to have extra weight on us,
etc. etc. In fourth density or in Pleiadian reality, is there
any attention at all on physical body type?
No,
there is no attention on body type. Now, we may have preferences,
but the preferences are so unimportant.
Well,
if you're all gorgeous, then why make a differentiation!
But
do you know why we are all gorgeous?
Yes,
I know. You all feel wonderful about yourselves, you feel beautiful,
you feel healthy, you feel vibrant.
That
is very accurate. If you all felt that way, you would all be "gorgeous" also.
But one of the reasons why you perceive that you are not all
gorgeous is that being in third density you still must create
ways to separate each other from each other. So you come up with
wonderful excuses for separation such as, "I can't be with that
person there because they're too skinny, they're too ugly, they're
too tall."
Oh,
conditions.
Exactly.
Conditional love. Separation. Those symbols have been necessary
for you to maintain the third-density identity. When you move
into fourth density, those symbols will change because you will
change.
So
you as Pleiadians can enjoy the differences in each others'
bodies?
Oh
yes. Most definitely. Now granted there are not a lot of differences
in our bodies, but we can certainly appreciate those differences
when they are there. Most definitely. But those differences are
not from the result of trying to keep ourselves separate. They
are natural diversifying characteristics.
If
you are so together and whole, why is it there is a need to
have another individual as a mate? If you are whole and not
separate, you would have all that male and female inside your
body. So what is the need for a mate?
There
is no need per se, in the sense that we do not need to seek this
idea. We may choose to have the idea literally for reasons of
enjoyment and fun. Do you see what we mean? Enjoyment. When we
express ourselves sexually with another entity, it is not that
they fulfill a need for us. It is that together we play and we
rejoice our own individual connections with the Creator. But
it is not a need in any way.
It
always seems in our society that people have relationships
out of needs.
Yes,
that is a third-density idea.
So
basically there is a separation on many levels of ourselves
and so we need to keep looking for relationships to fill the
void.
Exactly.
And that is the cycle. If individuals keep looking for someone
else to fulfill their needs, no one else will ever fulfill their
needs, so they will have a series of unsatisfying relationships.
When you learn that you are the only one who can satisfy yourself,
that you are the only one who can fulfill yourself, all of your
relationships become joyous and ecstatic. When you do not need
something from another individual, you can enjoy them for who
they truly are.
It's
almost like a paradox here. How can you really tell that it's
not out of a need for joy? How can you tell if it's just for
joy?
It's
a good question, and in no way would we ever say to you that
if you discover a relationship is out of need that you should
disregard it and throw it away. In fact, we would say, don't
swing that opposite way if you discover that. So discovering
it in this particular case is not necessarily a way that is going
to change it. Living the relationship, recognizing your motivation
and living it and healing through living it rather than rejecting
it is going to be much more helpful. It's quite all right to
be in a relationship out of need. Recognize the need. Work with
it, but do not reject it because of the need because you'll keep
creating relationships of need that you need to reject. Do you
follow what we mean?
I'm
thinking of multiple relationships at one time, having¾this
individual and this individual and this individual¾and finding
you're able to love all these individuals. Isn't that being
loving out of certain needs and out of the separations inside
the person?
Does
not have to be. Can be. If the person is looking for things that
they want inside of themselves in someone else and so they have
all these different relationships trying to get those things
into themselves, then it is out of need, yes. But if the person
possesses all those things inside of them and is operating from
total joy and ecstasy, they can have a relationship with none
or one or many people based on joy, fun and excitement instead
of need. Do you follow? There is a fine line. There is a difference.
Sasha,
why do you think it is so hard for us to visualize the relationships
that you are talking about, the ones that we're heading toward?
Because
the visualization of these relationships¾if you take it past
just the intellect, triggers a tremendous amount of fear, and
so the fear will reach out for protection and will often put
a wall down, so you cannot imagine it so you cannot be threatened.
Just
visualizing a relationship that wouldn't fulfill my needs would
scare me. Because that's what I'm in it for!
Yes.
exactly.
Could
you offer us an interpretation of these needs as pointing to
our eventual evolution into fourth density?
Yes.
Fourth density is integration. Third density is separation. To
use an analogy, separation is all the ingredients to make a soup
sitting separately on the counter. Integration is the entire
soup itself. Now, if you're going from third to fourth and seeking
to become whole, you must first recognize what the recipe requires.
The recipe requires carrots and celery. The recipe needs those
things, so for you to recognize those needs will allow you to
chop them up and throw them into the pot which will then become
the true expression of who you are in an integrated way. If you
do not want to look at your needs, you will not know the recipe,
you will not know how to cook the soup, and it will take a lot
more energy, pain and struggle to eventually try to make up the
recipe in a dark room. You see? The needs are important for the
eventual outcome of integration. So your needs in and of themselves
again are neutral ideas. They have no value except what you ascribe
to them. You cannot judge those carrots on the counter as being
wrong. How can you judge the carrots being wrong? It is your
needs that are those carrots. They are ideas that will eventually
be put into the pot, which will eventually become a very valuable
thing. Nothing exists without a purpose, and your needs, as dysfunctional
as they may be, are still eventually part of that soup and therefore
very valid and very important that you read those lines in the
recipe and chop up those vegetables and make them a part of the
creation you are attempting to bring forth.
And
the trick is to not expect to get the carrots from your mate.
Exactly.
You have to be the one to go out and get the carrots.
Go
to your own garden. In the way that relationships are set up
now where it's based on needs, if my mate does not provide
the needs that I expected my mate to provide, I become angry,
and obviously I think I'm angry at him but I'm angry because
I'm not getting my needs met through my own efforts. Then in
fourth-density relationships do you not have anger, or you
don't have that particular expression of anger?
We
don't have the expression of anger in the sense that we attach
it to another person. We do not have that particular expression.
There are times when we recognize, however, that perhaps we have
not been true to ourselves. Now again, we're talking in ways
that are different than you, where we will recognize that we
have embraced a reality that we don't prefer, and the anger that
is felt from that is not externalized.
You're
not attacking someone.
Exactly.
Sasha,
in the book "Messages from Michael" in the first few pages
Michael was discussing the fact that one of his purposes for
channeling information was to get us off of this attention
on relationships and help redirect our attention on self-improvement
(that's a paraphrase). It seems to me that part and parcel
of third-density relationships has been that the relationship
would take precedent over all else and that one of the things
that we're going through is the realization that personal growth
must take precedence. As long as the relationship takes precedence,
personal growth will always have to suffer. Do you want to
comment on that?
Well,
the way we will comment on it is that in one way there is no
must in the sense that you are very welcome to choose relationships
over personal growth, but don't expect the fourth-density package
deal with that choice. If you want to choose a relationship to
be more important than your personal growth, then recognize it's
a choice of separation and that with that choice comes the package
of third density. If you choose personal growth over relationships,
you are choosing to integrate yourself, you are making a fourth-density
choice and then you can accept the fourth-density package to
go along with it. So neither one is wrong nor right. We are simply
saying in terms of your choice, recognize what you get with that
choice.
But
if you choose personal growth, then you can use your relationship
to enhance that?
If
you choose personal growth, everything in your life (including
your relationships) will enhance that.
Recently
my relationship changed with my mate and I went on vacation.
The last thing on my mind was a new relationship. But it came
into my life suddenly.
You
have given yourself an opportunity now to make a conscious choice.
Do you want to pursue this relationship from a third-density
perspective, getting the package deal there, or do you want to
pursue it from the fourth-density relationship and getting the
package deal with that? So yes a whole new world has opened up
for you which can do nothing but enrich you in the long run.
I
have one question. Back in this needs issue, I'm pursuing or
engaged in a relationship by intention at the fourth density,
and I find that there's a tendency to go back and forth. The
intention is to maintain the fourth density, and if I don't
stay conscious of that intention really clearly, then there's
a tendency to think I need to fall into third density and fulfill
needs for the other person. And even if I'm able to say, "No,
I refuse to do that," then I start sometimes feeling guilty
that if I'm involving the other person totally at a fourth-density
level, then there's no room for them to get their needs met
by somebody else if that's their choice.
Ahhh,
but there is. We are sorry, but would you narrow the question
and ask it again.
Well,
I guess, the bottomline question with that as a set up is I
don't understand why I even feel concerned that I'm depriving
them of getting their physical or physiological needs met by
another person, if that's the case, from my third-density perspective.
You cannot deprive another person. If they feel deprived, it's
their choice. I appreciate that, but why does it seem to be
my choice to feel like I'm doing that? That's my question.
Because
you are making the transition from third to fourth, and you're
recognizing the specific areas that you would like to clear.
There is a part of you which still needs to feel validated by
providing for another. And like we say with the soup, that need
is okay. It needs to be seen and put in the pot in order to transform
into the soup. So your seeing that in yourself is very important.
I
follow, and I feel it's a very good answer, and I can tune
into it. But that still doesn't mean that I would then meet
those needs? Just recognizing them rather than meeting them.
We're
not understanding the exact question.
Well,
I think you are because you answered it perfectly! You said
that when I recognized the need that I would then put them
in the pot. But does that mean that I would then be physically
satisfying those needs, or just recognizing that her needs
exist?
Her
needs?
Yes.
That
doesn't matter. You are not responsible for whether her needs
are met or not. All you are responsible for is what in your integrity
you would like to give to a relationship. That is all you are
responsible for.
What
Sasha is not saying is that you cannot satisfy those needs
of another person. But you can play out that game, pulling
yourself back into third density, which is exactly what I do
not want to do. But sometimes I seem to feel that I could just
get out of the way and she could get her needs satisfied whatever
way she wanted but that's depriving the potential of the fourth-density
relationship.
Literally
75% of anger in relationships stems from one partner or the other
believing or being angry that the other person is not fulfilling
needs. Seventy-five percent. Now, imagine what a relationship
would be like if you did not need to be fulfilled by another.
For one thing, the level of anger would be very, very low¾hidden
anger, hostility, nearly nonexistent. You cannot know what the
other person's needs are. They will not verbalize them; sometimes
they don't even know themselves on the conscious level. If you
try to get caught in the game of satisfying those needs, you
will get caught because it is a game, and because the person
is seeking to have needs met outside of themselves, they will
never be satisfied, and then they will be angry.
So
all I can do is present myself at my fourth-density awareness,
and let it be whatever it ends up being. And just be pure in
my own intention.
Exactly.
One
of the things that we ran into was that I finally started examining
what I felt my needs were, and my two basic needs were safety
and protection. My husband tried to provide that safety and
protection for me, but he would have no idea how I want that
provided. In other words, my idea of safety was for him to
put his arm around me every time we walked into a room, but
he didn't know that that was what I wanted.
Exactly.
You can never second-guess another person, whether you're trying
to protect them from their emotions or you're trying to communicate
to them, you cannot know, so the only thing that you can do is
be 100% who you are. Period.
So
this now leaves us with one more need: the need for somebody
to be with us that maintains the fourth-density intention also.
Obviously that is a trap.
If
you have that need, you're not in fourth density. You are still
playing the third-density game.
Is
one of the reasons that new relationships are so delightful
is because we haven't started manipulating the other person?
Yes,
there has not been time yet for the new person to fulfill or
not fulfill your needs. That's why that sense of ecstasy is there.
However, as soon as they either start fulfilling you or not fulfilling
you, the anger, whether covert or overt, starts setting in, and
that's when the manipulation and the control begins.
That
is so correct, because I was just thinking about the new relationship
I was in, and it started out, I remember saying, "I don't expect
anything from it," and then I realized about two months into
it that I couldn't say that anymore, I expected a few things!
If the excitement and the romance does not peter out by its
own nature then it's simply sabotaged to death. Am I on track?
Yes.
Now the Pleiadian relationships framework can be likened to the
beginning of your relationships when your expectations were very
low and you are truly in the level of enjoyment, ecstasy, play,
caring and sharing. That taken 100-fold deeper is what our relationships
are like all the time. So when you have no expectations about
the other person fulfilling your needs, what a load off your
mind that is, what a load off your energy. You can enjoy yourself,
you can truly experience unconditional love. The conditional
love that is felt in third density is the love you will give
if your needs are met, and if your needs are not met you don't
give that love.
Can
you begin to experience that love while still having the needs
and recognizing them also?
Absolutely,
yes.
So
we don't have to wait for our needs to be gone for us to experience
this love?
Correct.
Again, it's not a light switch going on and off. It's a gradual
movement from third- to fourth-density thinking.
I
know a lot of people right now would chuck the whole fourth-density
idea if they thought they had to manually clear all their needs
before they got there. By recognizing when you are conditionally
loving someone, you then know there's an issue, so then you
can actually go through it by turning that around to unconditionally
loving them in spite of the issue. It will just automatically
start unfolding.
Yes.
What wonderful things await all of you! We know that your relationships
are painful, and we've heard comments that humans have made such
as, "If you can't feel the pain, you can't feel the ecstasy." In
third density, that makes a lot of sense. In fourth density,
that idea cannot exist. You all have a tremendous amount of love
and joy locked within you that will begin to blossom when you
stop expecting another person to validate you, when you stop
expecting another person to make you feel whole. Once that idea
is relinquished, you will soar. That love that you will contain
will be beyond what you can now conceive. You are moving in that
direction, and those of you who choose to embrace the fourth-density
idea, whether diving right in or taking it baby steps, going
to start seeing changes, and you're going to start feeling changes
inside of yourself. The pain will start to subside. The joy will
start to grow, and we truly are excited to watch this happen
because you will start to begin to see your divine connection.
You will start to begin to know truly the beams of love that
you really are. We would like to honor you and acknowledge you
for taking a path that, yes, is difficult. But we would also
like to remind you that if you were incapable of taking the path
you never would have chosen it. And so, we would like to close
this evening with that acknowledgement and recognition of all
that you've chosen, for like the analogy of the soup and the
carrot, the things that you see now that you don't like in yourself,
that you judge, that you're angry at, are so valuable because
they make up the soup. If you judge them, they will stay there
on the counter, and they will always be an issue. But if you
allow them to exist and you take them with you in your growth,
they will transform.
Much,
much, much love to each and every one of you. It has been an
absolute joy to have been a part of your gathering this evening,
and it is our sensing that we will speak again on this matter
shortly. Much love and goodnight.
Authors
Details:
Lyssa
Royal
Germane Channeled
Lyssa
Royal is an internationally known channel and author. Germane
considers himself to be a non physical group consciousness
associated with the Orion Light - a future integrated
version of the galactic family of which we on Earth are
a part.
He chose the name "Germane" because of it's english definition: "Coming
from the same source, or significantly relevant to." There
is no connection to St. Germain.
The
Authors Web Site |
|
